| Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Nothing new with the patch notes it seems :(
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.25 12:40:13
|
2. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I feel like they hopefully have something up their sleeve, maybe something big they aren't telling us about, I would say give it time, and pray that it gets fixed.
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.23 23:09:20
|
3. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: not really sure you should ever have a large group of HAW dreads even now on TQ that is still not a good idea and the largest fleets of blap dreads you see are in WH where they still die honorably if you enemy brings drea...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.21 01:05:54
|
4. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Sgt Ocker wrote: [ Adding an Ewar bonus to Carriers achieves nothing - Your still giving up 1/3rd of your Dps to field 3 easily destroyed, slow as a wet week fighters. like i said adding a t1 ...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.20 19:59:43
|
5. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Krevnos wrote: I think the real question you need to be asking is why would you want to use them anymore? Exactly what everyone wants answered, why use a carrier over a dread, they are both in the same class of ships ie Capitals, but the dre...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.20 18:53:10
|
6. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: not like its that far out and it would build onto the progression into super carriers who have their own bonuses for remote burst e-war. I see that as a logical step forward, only issue I see is the ships that use mid...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.20 13:30:03
|
7. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Sgt Ocker wrote: [ Adding an Ewar bonus to Carriers achieves nothing - Your still giving up 1/3rd of your Dps to field 3 easily destroyed, slow as a wet week fighters. like i said adding a t1 ewar bonus so not to...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.20 13:17:40
|
8. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Quote: To be honest adding e-war bonus would be less drastic than adding another tube as that make carriers the only things that can use all their fighter types at once(not saying it makes them strong at all but its drastic mechanically) but s...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.20 12:20:50
|
9. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Kirito Kid wrote: Kinda makes me sad the way they have implemented features and haven't really smoothed out the edges for carriers. I do think that another tube would be beneficial for e-war, I have had trouble on sisi...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.20 11:45:30
|
10. Sticky:[Citadels] Carriers - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Kinda makes me sad the way they have implemented features and haven't really smoothed out the edges for carriers. I do think that another tube would be beneficial for e-war, I have had trouble on sisi for my fighters keeping up with targets which ...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.04.20 11:11:58
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Unboxing the new Camera in EVE Online - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
If you are going to keep the old options for the Map, and Scanning, why not the camera. You are missing quite a few options when using the new camera over the old. When it comes to tracking, holding down 'c' can be a hassle, and the zoom in effect...
- by Kirito Kid - at 2016.02.12 16:07:07
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |